@rakinmunim sent me a paper a while ago that I finally had the time to figure out.  I'm going to paste the readme on my github here, because it is pretty short and sweet and to the point.

https://github.com/algo-dude/QuantConnect_public/tree/VWAP_trend

There is a popular SSRN paper floating around the quant world from some big names in the industry. You can find the paper here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4631351

I am fairly skeptical about claims such as

  • Our findings reveal that an initial investment of $25,000 in the VWAP Trend Trading strategy with QQQ would have grown to $192,656, net of commissions, yielding a 671% return. This performance is marked by a maximum drawdown of just 9.4% and a Sharpe Ratio of 2.1.

 

My personal opinion is that profitable research on trading strategies is extremely unlikely to be made public. I have attempted to recreate this paper's methodology with QuantConnect.

You can see a full backtest here: https://www.quantconnect.com/reports/2dd44a5c1394e0ba3de9c7f4d7dc0716

You can clone the backtest here: https://www.quantconnect.com/terminal/clone/-/2dd44a5c1394e0ba3de9c7f4d7dc0716/clone-of%3A-emotional-fluorescent-yellow-seahorse

Let me be very clear here unlike on my github: I wrote and tested this to publicly refute these guys that run a trading firm. I saw the owner of Bear Bull Traders published something else recently, and I think since I am new in the industry, it wouldn't hurt to write some counters to their paper and their claims. Check the paper and check the backtest code. If there's a glaring omission on my part, please let me know before I put them on blast on my LinkedIn.

 

**TLDR: I do not know why this is a published paper. If my logic is wrong, please comment here, ping me on Discord, or raise a PR.**